https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45944 Tue 08 Nov 2022 10:07:15 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32456 Mon 23 Sep 2019 12:46:33 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35114 0.5), the SWAT calibrated only to the streamflow did not provide reasonable soil moisture estimation at the HRU scale. Furthermore, the two calibrations showed significantly different catchment water budget estimation over long run. The SWAT calibrated against streamflow showed significantly less soil moisture store (21%) while much higher estimation for evapotranspiration (61%), while the multi-variable calibration model showed higher soil moisture stored (34%) but less evapotranspiration (47%). This different partitioning of the precipitation between soil moisture and streamflow was persistent throughout the seasons and this, in turn, affected the streamflow generation processes. This difference in the model prediction clearly has important implication for water management for the region, highlighting the importance of considering multiple hydrologic variables to improve model parameterization.]]> Fri 21 Jun 2019 10:25:58 AEST ]]>